The problems are simple the solutions not
After all the economic analysis I read lately about the global economy, I would like to simplify the European economy problems and its solutions that exist, but need political courage to implement them.
The most significant problems are;
1. Youth unemployment mainly in Spain, Portugal and Greece, but also in other European countries;
Source; http://marginalrevolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Youth-Unemployment-Europe_0.jpg
This structural unemployment is not only damaging to the unemployed youth but also to the economy, since the potentially most productive part of the labour force is excluded from employment. It is not accident that the biggest debtors have also the biggest problems with the youth employment.
The solution is to abolish all the legal and institutional obstacles that were created during the years of plenty. It needs to fight the unions? Yes that’s why it needs political courage.
2.Unsustainable current account deficit (the deficit that had to be covered by loans) created within years unbearable debt and is still creating them. If you look at the next chart;
Source; http://earlywarn.blogspot.cz/2012/05/one-way-us-is-like-piigs.html
The trends since 2008 are positive, yet still a lot has to be done to balance the current account between the borrowers and the debtors. Unfortunately there is no other way to solve the current account deficit, and the foreign debts, but by creating current account surplus, and it can be done only by reducing imports or by increasing exports (alternatively it can be solved by creating attractive investment opportunities, but it comes only with perspectively competitive economy).
Public and Private consumption as % of GDP
http://blog.securities.com/2011/11/consumption-patterns-across-european-union/
Source; http://blog.securities.com/2011/11/consumption-patterns-across-european-union/
In USA, the private consumption is about 71% of the GDP and adding to it the public consumption and almost no positive savings was left in the last years. Interestingly even if not surprisingly, the general consumption (Private and Public) is the highest in Greece and Portugal, while relatively low in Germany, reducing imports in the countries with high deficit can be done mainly by reducing the consumption there. But this means reduction of cumulative demand and with it comes necessarily the negative economic growth. This means the potential of creating economic growth with additional consumption can’t work, since the countries with big foreign debt and current account deficit like USA, Greece, Portugal are already consuming to much.
Conclusion? If to solve the big foreign debt and current account deficit, without to create huge deflation and unemployment it has to be by increasing the export to countries with low foreign debts. So the solution is to create demand for consumers goods and investments in the countries with low debt which are the Asian and Oil exporting countries;
Source; http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2009/9/23/saupload_current_account_balance_countries.png
Current Account Balance — G–20 Countries (USD)
3. The obvious solution is to create demand in the Asian and the Oil exporting countries. It is again political issue, yet while the Chinese seem to do gradually their share in the demand creation, other Asian countries, namely Japan, S.Korea, etc. have to follow. As to Oil exporting countries, their relatively low population, prevents from them to create significant demand, but they could invest their financial resources in other Muslim countries without oil, with huge population and huge investment needs, like Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, etc. It is also the interest of Saudi Arabia and other oil producing Arab countries, to support economic growth in the new democratic Arab countries, to prevent their political radicalization. Again it is up to the world leaders to explain to the Saudis, that if cleverly done, it could be the very best investment for them.
4. For years the developed countries propaganda was to help the under developed countries. Now the chance had come to turn the unused production capacities of the developed countries and use it for increasing investment and consumption in the less developed countries, that as it happened have also the lowest indebtedness. In principle what is needed is to transfer liabilities and subsequently assets from the rich but heavily indebted Europeans and USA to the poor but not indebted Asian countries.
5. The main problem to this scenario can come out of limited row materials and production capacity. Since in indebted European countries and USA the consumption will have to decrease, enough production capacity will be released, yet if economic growth has to excess the existing production capacities, row materials namely energy recourses will be needed for economic price. The latest new natural Gas field discoveries, seems came in the right moment.
6. The last but not the least, investments in scientific and technological research and in economic development has to focus on alternative solution for energy, and solving the environmental problems. This needs to channel the finances and the management effort of the most talented into the sciences and technology and not to finances, law or marketing. Direct involvement of governments in supporting this trend would be very welcomed.
Since the economic crisis is global, its solution has to be global, and again I have to speak about political leadership, who has to be committed to long run tasks and not only to the short term once.
From → Economic Growth, ECONOMICS, Economist view, Euro Crisis, MENUE
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
- The way out from WWII was the Marshal plan- | EugenR Lowy עוגן רודן
- The way out from WWII was the Marshal plan | EugenR Lowy עוגן רודן
- http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2013/07/paul-krugman-defining-prosperity-down.html#comment-6a00d83451b33869e20192abeb336e970dThe way out from WWII was the Marshal | EugenR Lowy עוגן רודן
Where does your assumption that the current account deficit have to be ‘solved’ come from?
Answer: It comes from the gold standard, but the gold standard ended in 1971, nearly 50 years ago.
Under the gold standard, the USA had to make up the imbalance in gold – which would clearly be a problem, but today China sells TVs to America and China gets dollars and that’s it. End of deal. China doesn’t then get a balancing payment in gold as it would in the days of the gold standard.
Americans have Chinese TVs and China has a bunch of dollars, and presumably everyone is happy or the trade wouldn’t have happened.
To think that there is now a problem, when the US can make as many Dollars as China wants to hold onto, is a big leap.
This is thinking from the gold standard era which is a totally different fixed-rate system to today’s floating rate system. Under a floating rate system, whoever gets the most stuff wins the real terms of trade.
Likewise Trump’s foolish remarks about Germany’s trade surplus. American’s get to drive cars that Germans made and the Germans get Dollars in return. That’s it, end of trade. If the Germans didn’t want those Dollars they wouldn’t have sold the cars. And if they would prefer to save the Dollars rather than spend them, then that’s very easy for the US Govt to offset, as it indeed does.
It should be a little alarming to you that you are using thinking which is nearly 50 years out of date to decide that something is a ‘problem’ today, when we operate a totally different floating rate system today..
LikeLike
Thank you James for your comment. I have to oppose your opinion about imbalance of US trade. It is a law of nature that imbalance, any kind of imbalance, have to be balanced. The question is not if it has to happen, but how and when it will happen. By long term smooth gradual process like the erosion of mountain, or a suddenly change like in the cases of earthquakes. If the Chinese accumulate big amount of dollars, they can manipulate the US economy. Other phenomena is, that production skills of the US will degradate, while the Chinese will be strengthen. On the other hand the US economy will be more and more focused on monetary activity, since the dollar has become the a major production and export item of the US economy. If these phenomena you find positive be it so, but do not believe such a process can continue to the infinity. By definition debt is covered by newly printed Dollars, and our world is finite, so most be limited the amount of US dollars issued. If it will not be limited by inteligable decision, it will happen by some kind of unexpected, unpredictable crisis.
The denial of need for equilbrium in economy is the same political problem as the denial of the need to balance the environment. Take Donald Trump’s policy in any field of economc issues. Environment, taxation, inequality of income, foreign relations, you name the rest. In all these fields his policy is based on phantasy and denial of basic facts of reality. Unfortunately economic and political process are long term and exceed the four year term of US presidency. US economy is like a big ship, you have to start to slow down hundred kilometers before you enter the port, otherwise the crash is inevitable.
LikeLike
Hellow my name is June and I’m a writer and this article really aided me. I’m refocused! Thanks very much!
LikeLike